R/Dean Daniel Lesson 55
Armageddon and Gog and Magog – Daniel 11:40-45
In this last section of
Daniel 11, beginning with verse 36, the shift has gone from historical events,
historical events which took place and were fulfilled during the time of
Antiochus Epiphanes who was one of the Seleucid kings; the Seleucids were one
of the four groups into which the Greek Empire of Alexander was divided, the
Seleucid Empire represented the king of the North. Now it’s important to keep these things
straight as we get into the last part of Daniel. When Alexander died his empire was divided up
among Lysimachus who had Thrace and Cassander who had Greece and the Seleucids who
controlled roughly Syria and Persia and much of Asia Minor, and then the
Ptolemies down south in Egypt.
In Daniel 11, consistently up
to the end of verse 34 the king of the North refers to the Seleucid
dynasty. And the Seleucid dynasty
controlled all this area you see on the map in what is now Turkey or Asia
Minor, Syria which is just north of Israel, over into Persia and this area
between the Tigris and Euphrates River, that’s modern Iraq; it is over in this
area further east that you get into modern Iran and then on the right of the
map is modern Afghanistan and Pakistan; this is the Indus River here to the
southeast. We have to keep these
geographical locations in mind; when the text talks about the king of the north
and the king of the south it’s talking with reference to Jerusalem so we have
to keep that in mind.
We saw that the king mentioned
in verse 36 is not Antiochus, that the events from 36 or are events that do not
fit any historical background; these are events that were not fulfilled in the
life of Antiochus Epiphanes or in the Seleucid Empire. They refer to future events, specifically the
reference of this king who will do according to his own will, sometimes called
the willful king, is the antichrist who is the ruler of the ten nation European
western confederacy, the king of the west.
And Daniel 11:36-39 go into the religious dimension of the kingdom that
comes into being. Now remember, let’s
put some things together from what we’ve studied in Daniel 7 and Daniel 8 and
that is the antichrist seems to be some second class secondary level ruler at
the beginning of the Tribulation. He may
not even be in a position of power at the time of the rapture. But he comes to power in a country, takes
over, conquers three other countries, and then seven other countries join with
him to make this ten nation confederacy.
It has its geographical and cultural root in the ancient Roman Empire so
it is referred to by students of prophecy as the Revived Roman Empire which
fits with the image of Daniel 2, the feet of iron and clay, iron coming from
the Roman Empire, the legs of iron and then the feet of iron and clay.
So that puts that together
for us. We concluded last time in verse
39, that he shall act “against the strongest of fortresses with a foreign god,”
so he is able to attack militarily some of the strongest fortifications in
military forces at that time with the aid of a foreign god and that seems to be
Satan, he is part of the satanic trinity of the end times, comprised of Satan,
the antichrist and the false prophet. He
is indwelt by Satan and it is through the energy and power of Satan that he is
able to defeat all of these armies. He
acknowledges this god and this god alone and he will advance his glory, and he
is going to rule over many. And it says
at the end he will divide the land for gain, and the land here would refer to
Israel when he has set up, as we saw in our study of Daniel 9, when he enters
into his peace treaty with Israel he is certainly going to enter into Israel
and utilize the resources of Israel for his own personal gain.
Now we come to Daniel
11:40. Verses 40-45 describe various
military campaigns related to this particular king. Now it seems fairly simple when you look at
these verses what is being described here.
And remember, this is part of a campaign. Sometimes we talk about the battle of
Armageddon but the word in the Greek used for “battle” is polemos and that refers to a campaign, not simply a battle. It is a series of battles that take place at
that particular time. And that seems to
be at least what comes at the end of this section, where we read in verse 45,
“And he will pitch the tents of his royal pavilion between the seas and the
beautiful Holy Mountain;” that would be between the Mediterranean and Mount
Zion or the temple mount, “yet he will come to his end,” that takes place at
the battle of Armageddon, but what precedes this. That’s the question.
What are the events described
in verses 40-45 and how do these relate to other Scriptural descriptions of
military campaigns related to the Tribulation.
And as Shakespeare wrote, “there’s the rub.” That is what is very difficult to figure
out. One of the things that has made
this difficult is usually as a pastor you like to be able to stand up in the
pulpit and say this is what the Word of God teaches. Well, I don’t know what the Word of God teaches
on this subject. Okay, shall we close in
prayer…. No. I have been beating my head
around on this particular issue for several months now, I started getting some
questions on this as we were looking at all the increasing terrorist attacks on
Israel, the bombings and as intense and tense as things were in the Middle East
back in March and April, people were trying to figure out, well if this whole
thing blows up into a major war between Israel and Iraq how does that fit into
Biblical prophecy. Now we all know the
principle that nothing prophetically has to take place before the rapture, so
let’s draw a timeline. We’re in the
Church Age and the rapture is going to come at some time, none of us know when,
that’s why it’s referred to as imminent, we don’t know when, nothing has to
take place for the rapture to occur.
Now that’s one statement, no
prophecy has to be fulfilled before the rapture occurs, but that is a different
statement from saying that some prophecy might be fulfilled before the rapture occurs,
but if any prophecy is fulfilled before the rapture occurs it’s prophecy that’s
not related to the timing of the rapture.
It’s related to what’s going to happen after the rapture which is the
seven year period of the Tribulation, known as the time of Jacob’s trouble or
Daniel’s seventieth week. So there may
be some things, and the battle described in Ezekiel 38 and 39 might be one of these events that takes
place before the end of the Church Age and is necessary to set things up
internationally, in the international community for the events that begin once
the antichrist, it might even be part of what brings the antichrist into power
so that he can sign a peace treaty with Israel at the beginning of the
Tribulation. That is one of the
scenarios that we’re going to look at.
But to say that some prophecy is fulfilled in the Church Age is not to
deny the principle of the immanency of the rapture because if this prophecy
does take place, if Ezekiel 38-39 the battle, the invasion of Gog and Magog, if
that takes place at the end of the Church Age, before the rapture, then it has
nothing to do with the rapture, it has to do with what will happen to Israel
subsequent to the rapture. But I have
problems with that view as we’ll see when we start evaluating some of these
different interpretations as we go through the study.
I want to begin by reading
through Daniel 11:40-45 so you have this in your mind; this lays out the
scenario and I’m just going to briefly comment on these events as we go
through. I’m going to put the map back
on the screen so you can have that as a reference point. It begins by saying “at the time of the end,”
which places it clearly in Daniel’s seventieth week. “And at the end of time the king of the South
shall attack him,” the king of the South is usually identified with Egypt. Now this is one of the questions that we have
to answer is: who is the king of the South?
It’s been identified all through this chapter with the Ptolemaic dynasty
or Egypt. The “king of the south is
going to attack him,” the antichrist, “and the king of the North will come
against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, with horsemen, and with many
ships;” notice he’s got a navy, an army and an armored cav, that’s the
chariots, “and he will enter countries, overflow them, and pass through.” So this describes a battle scene between the
antichrist, that’s the “he,” the king of the South and the king of the
North.
Daniel 11:41, “He will also
enter the Glorious Land,” the Glorious Land is Israel, and the antichrist
enters the Glorious Land in the midst of this combat. Now the question is, when this takes
place. I think this is taking place
about in the middle point of the Tribulation.
It very well could be, and I’m going to use a lot of subjunctives
tonight because you just can’t be dogmatic on some of these things, it very
well could be that this initial battle, the first point in verse 40-41, is the
result of the collapse of the peace, this global peace that the antichrist has
imposed on the world; it finally starts breaking down about halfway through, so
the southern block, usually described as a pan-Arabic block but even that’s
somewhat questionable, led by Egypt, is going to attack Israel because Israel
is the covenant partner of the antichrist.
So he comes in to defend his interest, in order to aid Israel, and he’s
attacked by the king of the north who may be…that’s one of the questions, who
is the king of the North? Is the king of
the North Syria? But the question there
is well, Syria doesn’t have a navy, if they do it’s not much of one, it
certainly doesn’t seem to fit the scenario here of someone who has chariots,
horsemen and many ships, a large army.
Or, as some suggest today, the king of the North is a conglomeration of
the Islamic nations that had made up the southern border or Russia, all the
“stans,” Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kurdistan, this sort of an Islamic
block. That would represent this
northern group and that could make sense, that you would have the king of the
North, the king of the South being Egypt in sort of a southern Arabic block
working together to attack and assault the king of the West, the king of the
Revived Roman Empire.
He enters the Glorious Land
and the idea here is that this occurs halfway through the Tribulation, this is
when he sets up the abomination of desolation.
But this could possibly occur earlier and this could just be phase one
of the Tribulation. Now if I put a chart
on the overhead of the Tribulation being seven years, remember it’s divided
into two three and a half year periods.
Generally speaking there is war, some war at the beginning of the
Tribulation, or the beginning of the first three and a half year period as the
antichrist consolidates his power.
Generally there is stability and peace throughout most of it because
remember when he sets up the abomination of desolation, we read about this in
Revelation 9, the false prophet is going to cause all to take the mark and
they’re all going to have to have it to buy and sell. So this is where things start getting
complicated, trying to put some of these things together because it’s at the
time of the abomination of desolation the Jews are told to flee. But there still seems to be some stability,
at least financially, because the false prophet is going to be imposing this
new tattoo or whatever it is on everybody to be able to buy and sell and engage
in any kind of global commerce. I
think…you start having a breakdown at the first part of this period and then
it’s in the latter part of the period, probably the last two years of this
period, where you really have a tremendous breakdown and a tremendous amount of
warfare taking place and that’s probably how this fits into the scenario.
In Daniel 11:41 we read, “He
shall also enter the Glorious Land, and many countries shall be overthrown; but
these shall escape from his hand: Edom, Moab and the prominent people of Ammon.” Now that’s the area on the southeast side of
the Jordan River. That’s the mountainous
area, the wilderness area, across from the Dead Sea, that’s the area where the
Jews are told to flee once they see the abomination of desolation, that’s the
area down there around Petra and Bozrah which is where they’re going to gather,
when at the end of the battle of Armageddon they finally call out to the Lord
and He comes to rescue them at that particular point in time. That’s why Edom, Moab and Ammon are
protected.
Daniel 11:42, “He shall
stretch out his hand against the countries and the land of Egypt shall not
escape,” so he specifically, the antichrist is going to come down through
Israel from the north, down through the south, come down and then he’s going to
defeat Egypt. Verse 43, “He shall have
power over the treasures of gold and silver, and over all the precious things
of Egypt, also the Libyans and Ethiopians shall follow at his heels.” So here there’s an indication, different
views on how that is exactly, that idiom, is to be interpreted. Some suggest that that indicates that Libya
and Ethiopia is in alliance with him, others would suggest that they’re in
opposition to him and they’re still fighting him. Verse 44, “But news from the East and the
North shall trouble him,” now he’s going to get tidings that something’s
happening up north. Now what’s happening
up north? If he’s already taken out the
king of the North this indicates there’s another northern power block, other
than the king of the North, and there’s going to be word from the king of the
East.
Hold your place and let’s
turn to Revelation 16:16; Revelation 16 is where we have the one clear mention
of the battle of Armageddon, which is really the campaign of Armageddon. Let’s back up to Revelation 16:12, this is
the sixth bowl judgment; the bowl judgments are the final judgments that take
place at the end of the Tribulation.
“Then the sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river, the
Euphrates, and its water was dried up, so that the way of the kings from the
east might be prepared.” Look at the
map; the river on the left is the Euphrates; this river is going to dry up
making it possible for the armies from the east to invade into Israel. That seems to fit the scenario that we have
in Daniel 11 that the antichrist, with his army down here in Egypt, is going to
now hear word that there is an army coming in from the east and also one from
the north. Now it doesn’t say much, it’s
just a hint, he hears tiding from the east and from the north and they trouble
him. “Therefore he shall go out with
great fury to destroy and annihilate many.”
So he heads back up into Israel, this is where he plants his tent,
between the waters and the temple, and this is where the final campaigns of
Armageddon take place and the antichrist is defeated.
That’s the scenario that
Daniel paints. Now the question is, how
does that relate to Ezekiel 38-39? So
let’s turn to Ezekiel 38 and I’m not going to spend time exegeting through this
whole thing bit by bit but I want to read through it and give you this summary
of what is going to take place in Israel’s future. In the context of Ezekiel, chapters 36-37
have talked about the renewal of Israel and the regathering of Israel; so that
has to take place prior to chapter 38.
Now that they are regathered they are going to be attacked. Now Israel, in terms of what’s happening in
Ezekiel 36-37, for all purposes, has regathered in the land. They have a national presence, they have a
national state, they are in the land, so this could happen technically at any
point from this point on.
Ezekiel 38:1, “And the word
of the LORD came to me, saying, [2] Son of man, set your face against Gog of
the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against
him.” Now these terms, if you trace them
out etymologically and you go back to the table of nations in Genesis 10-11,
you discover that the descendants of Magog, who was a son of Japheth, are later
called Scythians, and the Slavic people have
descended from Magog. Gog is usually
taken to be a reference to people in the extreme north as it’s described in
this passage. Rosh is seen as an
etymological root to Russia and I think there’s good support for that; also
Meshech etymologically seems to be related to the root for Moscow and Tubal
also seems to be related to another city in the area of what is now modern
Russia. So this seems to suggest
something even further north than the king of the North mentioned earlier.
Once again, just to give you
an idea, one of the problems is that we have to decide is the king of the North
in Daniel the same as Gog, Magog, Rosh, Meshech and Tubal in Ezekiel
38-39. One school of thought says yes,
they are equal; another school of thought says no, they are different. And I’ll show you why some people say that as
we go through this study. I tend to
think that they are different; you cannot identify them as the same because
different things happen; as we saw in Daniel 11 the king of the North is
defeated by the antichrist, but Gog, Meshech and Tubal, Gog and Magog and his
allies in Ezekiel 38 are destroyed supernaturally by God directly causing
earthquakes and the mountains to fall upon their weaponry and direct divine
intervention destroys them so that seems to suggest two different forces of
destruction.
Ezekiel 38:3, “God says to
them, Behold, I am against you, O Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal. [4] I will turn you around, and put hooks
into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses and
horsemen.” The idea of putting hooks
into the jaws indicates that this not something that they want to do
willingly. It’s not like Russia is
sitting up there and saying okay, now we’re going to invade the Middle
East. It’s like we don’t even want to do
this but because of alliances, because of other pressures, they are going to be
pulled into the Middle East warfare.
Ezekiel 38:5, “Persia,
Ethiopia, and Libya are with them,” now remember we saw in Daniel 11 that
Ethiopia and Libya are said to be antagonist to the antichrist there as well,
at least that’s how I understand that idiom.
Here we have a union of Gog, Meshech and Tubal is aligned with Persia,
Ethiopia and Libya. So over here we have
modern Libya and then Ethiopia is Sudan and modern Ethiopia down to the south
of Egypt, and then over here we have Persia which is modern Iran. So we have this alliance between God, Rosh,
Meshech and Tubal, Iran, Libya, and Ethiopia.
It sounds somewhat modern.
Then we get into verse 6,
“Gomer and all of his troops, and the house of Togarmah from the far north and
all of its troops. Now Gomer is often
identified with modern Eastern Europe, because if you go back and look at…most
ancient languages only had consonants, they didn’t have vowels, so if you spell
Gomer it looks like this. Now as words
go from one language to another, for example, your guttural “G” often hardens
to a hard “C” so then you have a word like CMR, and the Cimmerians are also
related to this eastern area. And then
as words go from one language to another often you have transposition of letters
and, for example, if you transpose those letters you come up with a GRM which
are the basic consonants in Germany. And
the descendants of Gomer, one of his descendants is Ashkenaz in Genesis 10, and
you have a Lake Ashkenaz up in Eastern Germany.
So these names that you find over in Europe often go back into the mists
of antiquity and yet you find certain fascinating correlations with Biblical
terminology and Biblical groups, tribal groups in Genesis 10 and 11.
So it seems to suggest that
this is a massive alliance where you have Gog, Meshech, Tubal aligned with
Iran, aligned with Libya and Ethiopia, aligned again with Eastern Europeans,
and then you have Togarmah and Beth-togarmah, which the house of Togarmah is
often allied with Eastern Europe, including Poland, Czechoslovakia, East
Germany, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and allied with all these other nations, so
that seems to be the source of this invasion.
Ezekiel 38:7, “Prepare
yourself and be ready, you and all your companies that are gathered about you,
and be a guard for them. [8] After many
days you will be visited; in the latter years,” that phrase is the same phrase
we find over in Daniel which places it in…in my thinking that places it inside
the Tribulation, “in the latter years you will come into the land of those
brought back from the sword, and gathered from many people on the mountains of
Israel.” So in the latter years you are
going to come into Israel. Verse 9, “You
will ascend, coming like a storm, covering the land like a cloud, you and all
your troops, and many people with you.
[10] Thus says the Lord God, On that day it shall come to pass,” notice
the phrase and if you want to I’d suggest underlining it, “that day,” every
time we see this let’s highlight it, “On that day it shall come to pass that
thoughts will arise in your mind and you will make an evil plan. [11] You will say, I will go up against the
land of unwalled villages. I will go to
a peaceful people who dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and
having neither bars nor gates.”
Now that’s a description of
Israel. I want you to pay attention to
that, they are described as a people who are peaceful, “unwalled villages,”
that doesn’t mean that they don’t have a military, that doesn’t mean that
they’re not protected; according to studies that Dr. Fruchtenbaum has done on
this idiom, he suggests that what this means is that they are in a state of
military security, they are at relative peace, it doesn’t mean no war at all,
but relative peace, but they are militarily secure in the land. And the Gog and Magog crowd attacks for the
purpose, Ezekiel 38:12, “Of taking plunder and booty, to stretch out your hand
against the waste places that are again inhabited, and against a people
gathered from the nations, who have acquired livestock and goods, who dwell in
the midst of the land.”
Ezekiel 38:13, they’re being
watched, by “Sheba, and Dedan and the merchants of Tarshish,” Sheba and Dedan
is a reference to groups that operated down here in the Arabian Peninsula, so
it’s like you have the Saudi’s down here in alliance with the merchants of Tarshish. Tarshish was out on the fringe of Europe in
Spain, and the merchants of Tarshish was a reference to those Europeans who
were going out and engaging in commerce.
So the descendants of that crowd would be Western Europe and the United
States. So the indication here suggests
that you have Saudi Arabia and the merchants of Tarshish, i.e., the people of
commerce in the west, are sitting there and saying well, “why have you come to
take plunder? Have you gathered your
army to take booty, to carry away silver and gold, to take away livestock and
goods, and to take great plunder?” So
they are being critical of this attack because it’s for the purpose of
devastating the land and taking away plunder.
God goes on to say in Ezekiel
38:14, “Therefore, son o man, prophecy and say to God, Thus says the Lord God,
On that day,” second reference to “that day,” the “that day” refers to the time
period when this attack occurs, “on that day when My people Israel dwell
safely, will you not know it? [15] Then
you will come from your place out of the far north,” so that’s one reason I
think that this is separate from the king of the North of Daniel 11, “you and
many people with you, all of them riding on horses, a great assembly and a
mighty army.” Now I’m just going to make
a brief comment, “riding on horses,” are they actually literally going to be
riding on horses. There are two views
here; one view is that the prophets are writing phenomena logically, that means
that in the ancient world they didn’t know what an M-60 tank looked like, they
didn’t have any idea what a Humvee was, and so they’re writing in terms of
their own vocabulary and so when they’re talking about chariots and horses and
ancient terminology they’re really describing what would be modern warfare. Another view is that if this takes place
toward the end of the Tribulation that because of all the judgments and war
that all the military stockpiles have already been used up and we’re back down
to primitive warfare again. And I tend
to go with that view, that what has happened is that this is probably, I take
the view that this is probably at the end of the Tribulation and they’ve used
up all their stockpiles of modern weapons, all the nuclear stuff shot off, all
the missiles are shot off, as a result of all the tremendous judgments that
take place during the Tribulation nobody has any hydroelectric plants working
any more, nobody is producing electricity, computers are shot, everybody is
back to a pre industrial age type of survival.
But I don’t think anybody can be terribly dogmatic on some of this.
Ezekiel 38:16, “And you will
come up against My people Israel like a cloud to cover the land. It will be in the latter days that I will
bring you against My land so that the nations may know Me,” so God has a
purpose for bringing it about, they think they’re coming down for plunder,
God’s bringing them down because in defeating them God’s going to demonstrate
who He is. “I will bring you against My
land, so that the nations may know Me when I am hallowed in you, O Gog, before
their eyes. [17] Thus says the Lord God,
Are you he of whom I have spoken in former days by My servants, the prophets of
Israel, who prophesied for years in those days that I would bring you against
them? [18] And it will come to pass at
the same time, when Gog comes against the land of Israel, My fury will show on
My face, [19] For in My jealousy and the fire of My wrath I have spoken; surely
in that day there shall be a great earthquake in the land of Israel, [20] so
that the fish of the sea, the birds of the heavens, the beasts of the field,
all the creeping things that creep on the earth, and all the men who are on the
face of the earth will shake at My presence,” this is a massive earthquake that
is really felt all over the earth, “the mountains shall be thrown down, the
steep places shall fall, and every wall will fall to the ground. [21] And I shall call for a sword against God
throughout all My mountains,” so they’re coming from the far north down through
the Taurus Mountains, down through Syria, this earthquake is going to wipe out
this army as it’s headed south.
Then God’s going to do
something to bring confusion into the army as a result of this, not unlike what
happened in Gideon’s day when God brought confusion to the Midianites and they
just started fighting each other and the whole army self-destructs, and that’s
the description of verse 21, “Every man’s sword will be against his
brother. [22] And I will bring him to
judgment with pestilence and bloodshed, and I will rain down on him and on his
troops, and on the many peoples who are with him, flooding rain, great
hailstones, fire and brimstone.” Now
that seems to fit with certain types of pictures that we find in Revelation when
it comes to the trumpet and the bowl judgments.
For example, in the trumpet judgments you have earthquakes, you have a
third of the earth being destroyed, you have hail coming down from heaven, all
of these things take place, the waters are struck, the seas are struck, you
have the heavens struck, the stars are darkened, all of these things take place
early on in the Tribulation so it certainly has a Tribulation feel to it. That’s one reason why I am suspicious of
putting this early, in the Church Age or even after the rapture.
Ezekiel 39:1, “And you, son
of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, Thus says the Lord God, Behold, I am
against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, [2] I will turn you
around, lead you on, bringing you up from the far north, and bringing you against
the mountains of Israel. [3] Then I will
knock the bow out of your left hand; cause the arrows to fall out of your right
hand. [4] You shall fall upon the
mountains of Israel, you and all your troops, and the peoples who are with
you,” so they are destroyed in the land of Israel, “I will give you to the
birds of prey” and he goes on and explains more of this.
Then the purpose is described
starting in Ezekiel 39:6, “I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in
security in the coastlands,” that’s those who are living along the coast of the
Mediterranean in Israel, “then they shall know that I am the LORD.” Why does this battle take place? So that the world knows who God is. Now I have a difficulty placing that
terminology into the Church Age or even before the Tribulation. That seems to be terminology related to the
end of the Tribulation, when man finally knows who the Lord is. Verse 7, “So I will make My holy name known
in the midst of My people Israel, and I will not let them profane My holy name
any more. Then the nations shall know
that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.
[8] Surely, it is coming and it shall be done, declares the Lord. This is the day,” there’s the third time that
term is used, “This is the day of which I have spoken. [9] Then those who dwell in the cities of
Israel will go out, and set on fire and burn weapons,” after the battle is over
with, those who live in Israel are going to go out and they’re going to gather
up all the debris from the battle, from all the fuel, all of the weaponry,
everything, and burn the weapons, “both the shields and bucklers, bows and
arrows, the javelins and spears and they will make fires with them for seven
years.” That’s a lot of equipment. But there’s this seven year clean up of the battle,
seven years worth of fuel that is being used.
Ezekiel 39:10, “Then they
will not take wood from the field nor cut down any from the forest, because
they will make fires with the weapons, and they will plunder those who
plundered them, and pillage those who pillaged them.” So you have this seven year period where
they’re burning fuel; it’s hard to reconcile that with certain scenarios, how
this fits, because in the second half of the Tribulation Israel is fighting for
their survival, they are not going to be cleaning up the battlefield, they are
told to flee to the hills, once they see the abomination of desolation; you
don’t see them going out and cleaning up the weaponry, you just see more and
more devastation taking place during that last part of the Tribulation.
Ezekiel 39:11, “And it will
come to pass in that day,” this is the fourth use of the phrase, “that I will
give Gog a burial place there in Israel, they valley of those who pass by east
of the sea,” that’s east of the river Jordan, east of the Dead Sea, “and it
will obstruct travelers because there they will bury Gog and all his multitude,
therefore they will call it The Valley of Hamon-Gog. [12] For seven months the house of Israel
will be burying them,” do you see Israel gathering up the dead and burying them
for seven months while they’re in the second half of the Tribulation fighting
for their survival. They don’t have time
to do that. So that’s one of the
problems in putting this together is anything that puts this battle too early
in the Tribulation you end up having the Jews trying to do this cleanup during
their worst war ever and the greatest time of needing to survive. And then notice, it says, “the house of
Israel will be burying them in order to cleanse the land,” make a not here,
Israel is cleansing the land. Verse 13,
“Indeed, all the people of the land bill be burying, and they will gain renown
[can’t understand word] on the day that I am glorified.” The day that the Lord is glorified is the
Second Coming. [14] “They will set apart
man regularly employed with the help of the search party to pass through the
land, bury the bodies that remain on the ground in order to cleanse it. At the end of seven months they will make a
search. [15] The search party will pass
through the land and when anyone sees a man’s bone, he will set a marker by it
until the buriers have buried it in the valley of Hamon-Gog.” That’s a detailed search, you don’t do that
in time of warfare, they are going through and they are meticulously going over
every square inch of the land to clean up all of these remains from the
battle.
Ezekiel 39:17, “And as for
you, son of man, thus says the Lord, Speak to every kind of a bird and to every
beast of the field, Assemble yourselves and come and gather together from all
sides to My sacrificial meal” so God’s going to bring all these birds to the
land to clean up the dead. And these
carrion vultures are going to come in and eat the dead so at least there’s not
going to be a lot of stench and a lot of disease from all the dead bodies
throughout the land. That seems also to
me to be a picture of the consequences of Armageddon, but there are problems
with that.
Let’s get down to Ezekiel
39:21, “I will set My glory among the nations;” My glory is a technical term
for the Shekinah of the Lord Jesus Christ, “I will set My glory among the
nations; and all the nations shall see My judgment which I have executed and My
hand which I have laid on them. [22] So
the house of Israel shall know that I am the LORD their God from that day
forward.” That’s the fifth use of “that
day,” I take it that all the “that day’s” refer to the same event and you can’t
separate these events in time. And then
the rest of the chapter, from verse 23 on, “The Gentiles shall know that the
house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity because they were
unfaithful to Me, therefore I hid My face from them,” it talks about the
testimony to the Gentiles and the verbiage from verse 23 on clearly speaks of
the end of the Tribulation and concludes in verse 29, “I will have poured out
My Spirit on the house of Israel,” that’s New Covenant terminology and that
takes place at the end of the Tribulation.
Now that just gives you a
brief summary of what takes place in these two chapters so that we can then
address the question of how these fit together.
There are seven views on how these events are placed and fit together
with the events of the Tribulation. We have
the Church Age, we have the Tribulation and we have the Millennium. Notice I have put a gap in here between each
one of these for the reason that most people realize there’s some sort of gap
between the rapture and the signing of the peace treaty that begins the
Tribulation. No one knows how long that
gap is. There’s also a gap as we’ll see
next time when we get into Daniel 12, there’s a gap between the Second Coming
of Christ and the beginning of the Millennium.
Where do the events of
Ezekiel 38 and 39 take place and how does that relate to Daniel 11? That’s the tough question. The first suggestion is from the allegorical
interpreters and that is that this is purely symbolic. We’re just going to reject that out of hand
because it’s not based on a literal historical interpretation of the
Scripture. But many people think oh,
this is just sort of allegorical and it’s merely a description of some future
assault by the Babylonians or the Romans or whatever on Israel. But that’s not grounded in the text; it
doesn’t interpret the text literally so we’ll just reject that out of hand.
The second view handles
things a little more seriously. This
view, I think, is one of two views that has significant merit to it. I think that the battle, Gog and Magog in
Ezekiel 38…[tape turns]
…probably right after the
rapture, or it takes place at the end of the Tribulation. My vote at this point goes to the end of the
Tribulation but I want to go through this material and help you understand
something about what the issues are. Who
takes this view, that it is before the Tribulation and maybe even at the end of
the Church Age? Arnold Fruchtenbaum
takes this view, Tim LaHaye takes this view, this is the view that’s in the Left Behind books, Tommy Ice takes this
view, and they basically were all influenced by a guy who was a pastor of
Arnold Fruchtenbaum by the name of David L. Cooper. The view here stresses the fact that in
Ezekiel 38-39 Israel is living in unwalled villages, they’re living in a time
of military security. When you get past
the mid point of the Tribulation, once the antichrist has invaded, his army is
on the land, he’s got his statue in the temple, warfare is taking place, it’s
not a time of military security. Now
that’s a major problem for my view because this text says clearly they’re
living in a time of military security.
The second point they bring
up is that it’s going to take seven years to clean up the military debris. Now if you put the battle at the midpoint of
the Tribulation, like many people, at the midpoint of the Tribulation, you don’t
see Israel cleaning things up during the last three and a half years when
they’re fighting for their survival. So
that seems to be a problem. Now because
of that Arnold argues that the seven years has to be completed before the
midpoint of the Tribulation. That means
that the battle of Gog and Magog has to take place at least three and a half
years before the Tribulation and that can put it into the Church Age. And if it doesn’t put it in the Church Age it
means there’s at least three and a half years between the rapture and the
beginning of the Tribulation. Now I have
a problem with that, just sort of abstractly, because in all of the transition
times that we find in the Scriptures, between dispensations, for example, the
crucifixion is the end of the Law, that’s the end of the age of Israel, but the
day of Pentecost doesn’t begin the Church Age for forty days so you have a
forty day gap. You’re going to have
another gap in Daniel 12 of about 40 or 50 days. You don’t have any transition times between
dispensations in the Scripture of three and a half, four, five year periods of
time. I’ve heard some people even
suggest 8 or 10 years between the rapture and the beginning of the
Tribulation. I just have trouble seeing
that much of a time gap but once again, that’s more my sense of the text and
doesn’t have anything to do with any particular passage.
The third argument that Arnold
and Tommy, in fact I think Charlie Clough takes this position as well, a third
position they argue is that Jesus cleanses the land when He returns at the end
of the Tribulation. I’ve talked to Tommy
about this several times, in fact I called him up this morning and said give me
one passage in Scripture that says that Jesus cleanses the land. I’ve got three statements here in Ezekiel 39
that says that Israel is going to cleanse the land when they bring up the dead
bodies; where do you get a statement that Jesus cleanses the land when He
returns at the Second Coming. Well,
that’s really a theological inference from comparing a number of passages, and
that’s true. I can see that theological
inference and some legitimacy to that, so it’s not like it’s just some guess,
but when Jesus Christ returns you’re going to have a change in the topography
of Israel, this enormous mountain in the middle of Israel is going to come up
because of this earthquake that takes place at the end of the Tribulation and
that’s where they’re going to build the one square mile temple compound for the
millennial temple. Now if that’s going
to occur and they’re going to build the millennial temple right after the
Second Coming, the beginning of the millennium, I don’t see them taking seven
months in that period picking up all the dead bones that might be found there
to cleanse that land for the temple. So
it’s clearly a complex situation.
That’s their view; the
weaknesses with that view is first of all, I don’t think the text of Ezekiel 39
allows for a break between verse 20 and
verse 21; that’s Arnold’s argument.
Arnold says that starting in verse 21 of chapter 39, down to the end of
the chapter, that’s clearly Second Coming events. But verse 22 says, “So the house of Israel
shall know that I am the LORD their God from that day forward.” Well, I don’t see Israel knowing who God is
and being saved until right at the end of Armageddon. And the term “that day” used in verse 22 ties
in to “that day” of verse 11 and verse 8, and back into chapter 38, the whole
Gog/Magog invasion. So that’s a problem.
Second, Israel is clearly
stated to be the one who cleanses the land through this seven month long burial
process, not the Lord Jesus Christ at His return.
Third, no passage is found
specifically stating that it is the Lord Jesus Christ who cleanses the land;
that’s a theological inference that is not necessarily supported by the text.
And then fourth, you have
various statements in this section, such as 38:23, “Thus I will magnify Myself,
and sanctify Myself, and I will make Myself known in the eyes of many nations,
then they shall know that I am the LORD.”
Also in 39:7, 39:13 and 39:21 all seem to suggest that at the time of
the destruction of Gog and Magog the world knows who God is. And I don’t see that taking place three and a
half years before the Tribulation begins or between the rapture and the
Tribulation; I see that as something that happens at the end of the
Tribulation.
The third view is the view
that it takes place early in the Tribulation, but once again, if it takes place
early in the Tribulation you have a problem with this seven year cleanup. Arnold’s right, that seven year cleanup has
to either be finished by the halfway point of the Tribulation or it doesn’t
even start until the end of the Tribulation.
That’s why I think the only two views that really have any substance to
them are the view that it takes place between the rapture and the beginning of
the Tribulation, or at the end of the Tribulation, because I just don’t see
Israel being able to do any cleanup during the second half of the Tribulation
when they’re fighting for their very survival.
The fourth view is the view
of Dr. Walvoord who is the Dean of Dispensationalism and Eschatology and former
President of Dallas Seminary and probably has done more writing on prophecy
than anybody else in the 20th century and he holds the view, as do a
number of other well-known prophecy scholars and dispensationalists, that it
takes place at the beginning of the last three and a half year period or just
after the midpoint of the Tribulation.
The basis for that is that they argue that the “dwelling securely in the
land in unwalled villages” is a result of the covenant with the antichrist and
that doesn’t fall apart until the halfway point of the Tribulation. They also, some in this camp, connect the Gog
and Magog to the king of the North in Daniel 11 and the king of the North
invasion in Daniel 11 takes place at the beginning of this period so they make
that connection. The problems are still
what I’ve said before, you don’t have the time for the seven year cleanup. The dwelling in unwalled villages doesn’t
necessitate that it’s under the covenant of the antichrist. The king of the North, I don’t think, ought
to be identified with Gog, Magog, Meshech and Tubal. And for all of these reasons I think you have
more problems with this fourth position than the third position.
The fifth position is that it
takes place at the end of the Tribulation, that this is part of the battle of
Armageddon, part of the campaign of Armageddon, and I would argue that what
happens in Daniel 11 is that the king of the North and the king of the South
operate against, or are in tandem against the antichrist. They are defeated and then when he’s down in
Egypt he hears rumors from the far north and that is Gog, Meshech and Tubal
coming down in their invasion in concert with the kings of the East. They all hit Israel, they are going to be
destroyed, Gog, Meshech and Tubal, not the kings of the north, but Gog is
destroyed supernaturally by God, the kings of the East are also destroyed in
that way, and the focal point of Ezekiel 38-39 is simply on that one aspect of
the overall Armageddon campaign.
This is a position that’s
held by Dwight Pentecost who taught at Dallas Seminary for many years and wrote
a classic on prophecy on Things to Come. It’s the position of Pastor Thieme, the
position of Hal Lindsay, and a number of other scholars. It’s interesting, I’m looking at my Tim LaHaye Prophecy Study Bible and just
to let you know that there’s a lot of confusion on this, in the footnotes, the
notes at the bottom of the page that just footnoted the different verses,
whoever wrote the notes for Ezekiel put the battle of Gog and Magog early in
the Tribulation, but then this Bible has a number of different one-page
articles in it that are quite helpful and quite instructive on a lot of
different issues, and there’s one written by a Dallas grad, he’s writing his
dissertation at Dallas right now on the dating of Revelation, a good prophecy
scholar, a pastor in Oklahoma City by the name of Mark Hitchcock, and Mark
wrote the article on Gog and Magog, and he argues that it is…he identifies it
with the king of the North and that it is Russia and that it takes place at the
end of the Tribulation. So even within
the Tim LaHaye Prophecy Study Bible
there is clearly a discrepancy of opinion by these various editors. So there’s no clarity on this and it’s just a
maelstrom, a whirlpool that you get into trying to make all these things fit
together and it just turns your head inside out.
A sixth view tries to place
it between the Second Coming and the beginning of the Millennium but there’s no
support for that and there’s not enough time, as we’ll see, we’ll interact with
that a little more next time in Daniel 12.
And then the last view, the
seventh view places it at the end of the Millennium and tries to identify it
with the Gog and Magog revolution that Satan leads at the end of the
Millennium. But that really doesn’t fit
any of the other factors that are given in Ezekiel 38-39 which clearly, the
fact that at the end of 39 it says “then I will pour out My Spirit on Israel,”
that is clear terminology used in Joel 2, used in Jeremiah 31, used in Ezekiel
36, all relating to the beginning of the New Covenant.
So my conclusion in this is
that my inclination is to place Ezekiel 38 and 39 at the end of the Tribulation,
that Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38 and 39 are not the king of the North, they are
another northern power distinct from the king of the North, but I think there
is also some strong support for the view that it could take place prior to the
Tribulation, either at the end of the Church Age but I doubt that, but during
some interim period between the rapture and the beginning of the Tribulation.
So that sort of gives you an
idea of the kind of things you have to struggle with. I had several questions about this back in
March and April where I began doing work on this and I’ve read, in fact, today,
just to go back over it again I pulled three different textbooks on eschatology
out and they all differed and they all gave different arguments. Nobody has any real certainty here and I think
that if you hear anybody teach on this with any great degree of dogmatism,
unless they come out with some great new insight, take it with a grain of
salt. I don’t think anybody has real
clarity on how Ezekiel 38 and 39 really tie into the Tribulation just yet.
That wraps up our study of
Daniel 11 and next time we’ll begin the last chapter in Daniel, Daniel 12.
[42] Then he will stretch out his hand
against the other countries, and the land of Egypt will not escape. [43] But he will gain control over the hidden
treasures of gold and silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt; and
Libyans and Ethiopians will follow at his heels. [44] But rumors from the East and from the
North will disturb him, and he will go forth with great wrath to destroy and
annihilate many. [45] And he will pitch
the tents of his royal pavilion between the seas and the beautiful Holy
Mountain; yet he will come to his end, and no one will help him.”
and the king of the North
will come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, with horsemen, and with
many ships; and he will enter countries, overflow them, and pass through. [41] He will also enter the Beautiful Land,
and many countries will fall; but these will be rescued out of his hand: Edam,
Moab and the foremost of the sons of Ammon.
[42] Then he will stretch out his hand against the other countries, and
the land of Egypt will not escape. [43]
But he will gain control over the hidden treasures of gold and silver, and over
all the precious things of Egypt; and Libyans and Ethiopians will follow at his
heels. [44] But rumors fro the East and
from the North will disturb him, and he will go forth with great wrath to
destroy and annihilate many. [45] And he
will pitch the tents of his royal pavilion between the seas and the beautiful
Holy Mountain; yet he will come to his end, and no one will help him.”