Review: Babel, Genesis of Kosmic Thought I, Gen 10,11
Starting
in Romans 1:17 and going into the beginning of chapter 2 Paul almost gives us a
historical perspective on what has happened historically, and we see the
dynamics of what is going on as a consequence of human depravity. Romans 1:18, “For
the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and
unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness.” The term “wrath
of God” is a technical term for the outworking of the justice of God on
rebellious humanity. It is not a statement of His getting literally angry, He
is simply demonstrating His justice toward man because of rebelliousness. The “men”
is this verse are tose who “suppress the truth in unrighteousness.” This is an
adjectival statement describing men and giving content to the meaning of
ungodliness and unrighteousness. The word “suppressing” in English has the idea
of holding something down, but the Greek word here is KATECHO [katexw] which does have that idea
but it also has the idea of simply holding something. The verb ECHO [e)xw] means to have or to hold,
to hold on to something; KATA [kata], the preposition that is
prefixed to this word making it a compound verb intensifies the meaning of the
main verb. So it means to hold something, to hold something, and sometimes to
suppress something; but here it is talking about holding on to certain truths
by means of, and this is the Greek preposition EN [e)n] plus the dative which has the idea of instrumental means. Mankind in
ungodliness and unrighteousness is holding on to truth [lower case true] by
means of unrighteousness. They have taken something that is true and have
redefined it. It is like putting a new spin on the truth until it is completely
different from what it was originally understood to be. Every human being is a
good spin doctor on God-consciousness. That is what is happening to them. They
are taking truth that is evident to them in creation, that God makes evident
within us, and they are holding this truth by means of unrighteousness. They
take this truth and spin it so that man is not as bad as Scripture says he is
and God is not the creator that the Bible says He is. Here Paul is reflecting
what happened historically in that post-flood civilization. They very quickly kicked
into gear their sin nature in terms of reinterpreting truth.
Romans
1:19, “Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath
showed it unto them.” In fact, every individual knows that God exists. Romans
1:20, “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are
clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal
power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” The revelation of God is
so clear and so precise that every human being who reaches God-consciousness
have no excuse before the judgment of God. They can’t say they needed more
evidence that He existed. Romans 1:21, “Because that, when they knew God, they
glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their
imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.” What happened historically
was that they knew God. They had the evidence from the flood. When they came
off the ark and for the next few generations they were still seeing the
reverberations of the flood in terms of both geology, earthquakes, and also in
the weather. Those men who were eyewitnesses to the flood were able to give
testimony to their great, great grandchildren. What those great grandchildren
did was reject that testimony, they rebelled against God, and they tried to
redefine what had happened in terms of these various mythologies. And that is
what the tower of Babel in Genesis 11 is really all about. Genesis 10 gives us
a description of how the descendants of Noah scattered over the face of the
earth. Then in Genesis 11:1-9 there is a description of the tower of Babel and
the human race under the leadership of Nimrod and how they sought to build this
tower to heaven, they sought to make a name, a reputation, for themselves that
is superior to God’s reputation. What the writer is indicating is that they are
seeking to set themselves over against God. They are worshipping the creature
instead of the creator. There was no gratefulness and grace orientation for
what God has done in destroying the antediluvian situation, and after the flood
antagonism sets in with the arrogance of man’s soul, and they are reinterpreting
the flood as God making war against man. So now they have to protect themselves
from God, which is the reason for building the tower. That becomes the historical
basis, even though it gets lost over time, throughout the ancient near east for
why they established their worship sites in high places. They saw these as a
place of refuge from the judgment of God.
So
rather than being grateful to God and worshipping God they rebel against God
and blame Him for what happened in destroying the ancient civilization. “Their foolish
hearts were darkened,” which indicates that their thinking begins to be clouded,
they can no longer think according to reality, and the result of this is not
simply spiritual, which is Paul’s point, but it also impacts the knowledge that
they had. The early survivors of the flood carried with them the knowledge of
the antediluvian civilization and its technology. Paul’s comment is that anyone
is spiritual darkness, though professing to be wise—they may have a Ph D from
Harvard or Cambridge, written various
erudite books—they are fools. They may have a high IQ and great education but
they have rejected the creator God of the Bible. Romans 1:23, “And exchanged
the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.” This is a picture
of primitive idolatry. There are examples of this that have survived in time. As
time went by those idols became less concrete and more abstract until there
were men worshipping ideas rather than images made of stone or wood.
Then
we see that as a result of this there is a progression in time. Romans 1:24, “Wherefore
God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to
dishonour their own bodies between themselves.” The more they want to rebel,
the more God restrains the evil that they are able to do. So there is a gradual
deterioration among these Gentile nations in the ancient world. Romans 1:25, “Who
changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature
more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.’ So we see there is a certain
progression that takes place once there is a worship of the creature rather
than the creator. Romans 1:26, “For this reason…” For what reason” Once you do
away with the God of the Bible something moves into that vacuum. The something
else that dominates, that becomes god, is something in the creation. You are
going to deify something in the creation—matter, energy, some element of
philosophy, some abstract ideal. “God gave them up unto vile affections: for
even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature.”
This is sexual lust. There is a connection here that Paul is showing between
sexual depravity and spiritual rebellion. Rejection of God as creator leads in
a straight line deterioration in terms of sexual perversion and sexual depravity.
Sociologists today will challenge that, but this is what the Scripture says.
All
of this introduces us to the basic elements of what we have defined as cosmic
thinking. The Greek word for “world” is KOSMOS [kosmoj]. It can refer to the world, the earth, to a
system. Usually it has the idea of some sort of organized system. It may refer
to any kind of organized system but primarily in the Scripture it is talking
about an organized system of thought, and the word KOSMOS is used to refer to all of
those thought systems that man develops that are hostile to God. As we have
seen many times, on one side we have the divine viewpoint which is the unified
viewpoint of Scripture. The Bible expresses one and only one unified concept. Over
against this man has developed his own viewpoint, so we have human viewpoint. Human
viewpoint isn’t monolithic, there are all kinds of human viewpoint; at least it
looks like that on the surface. But when we boil them all down they are all
basically saying the same thing. Another word we use for human viewpoint is
paganism. Paganism is not a pejorative term, it refers to non-biblical
thinking. Anyone who doesn’t think according to the Bible is a pagan, according
to Webster’s Dictionary. Paganism is also demonism, demonic thought, according
to James 3:13-15. It is that which has affinity with the soulish person, i.e.
the unbeliever. So this is a way of thought that is promoted by man against
God.
So
we have to ask the question: What are the basic elements of human viewpoint thought?
The first element is arrogance, man’s assertion of his own authority. Man
thinks he is somebody when he is nobody. In arrogance we talk about the basic
arrogance skills. Arrogance skills are self-absorption where we are completely absorbed
with ourselves. Then we give in to ourselves—self-indulgence. We give in to our
thinking, there is no self-discipline, we just go with the flow of our own lust
pattern. Then there is self-justification, where we are justifying all of our
basic wants and needs and why we have done what we have done. This leads
eventually into self-deception. We are divorced in an extreme way from reality
and are just living in a false understanding of the world. This leads to the
fifth which is self-deification. All that is a part of arrogance. So the first
characteristic of arrogance is human self-assertion against God. It is man
elevating himself over against the creator God of the universe; it is the
rebellion against the authority of God—minus authority orientation toward God. The
more man rebels against the authority of God the more there is going to be
rebellion toward other elements of authority which God has legitimately set up
in the world. Man replaces God as the ultimate determiner of value. So man becomes
the center of the universe: How do you know what is right and wrong? It is
whatever society determines, or whatever a sub-group of society determines. This
kind of thinking is demonstrated today in sociology text books, in history text
books, in literature; so for one going off to school this is going to hit left
and right and that one had better be prepared.
The
tower of Babel is the real point in Genesis 10 & 11. The dynamic is: “They
became futile in their speculations and their foolish heart was darkened.” This
is what sin does, it makes you think that somehow you can escape God, and
through this process of carnality and rejection of God you are reducing God to
something that man can control. So the second dynamic in cosmic thinking is
fear and dread of God which becomes the underlying motivation to try to escape
God. What happens when there is this fear and dread of something? It promotes a
hostility toward that which threatens you. The whole cosmic system has its
historical source at the tower of Babel. This is the prototype for the development
of the cosmic system. The characteristics of the cosmic system and cosmic
thinking grow out of what happens in Genesis chapter eleven. One of the things
we should note is that at the end of this narrative in Genesis 11:9, the end of
the toledot, there is a note of judgment, of hopelessness and despair. There
is no note of hope at the end of the episode at the tower of Babel. It leaves
us hanging, and this is what the writer under the inspiration of the Holy
Spirit wants to do. Where is the hope? And this is the introduction to Abraham
because the hope for mankind now is going to be what God does through Abraham
and the seed of Abraham. It is through the seed of Abraham that redemption will
come, the curse will be reversed, and it is through the seed of Abraham that
there will be the establishment of perfect environment in the Millennial
kingdom, the curse is rolled back, and eventually the establishment of the new
heavens and the new earth. But the tower of Babel gives us a foreshadowing of
what man does throughout history under the guise of the city of man in conflict
with the rule of God in history.